Technology & SaaS M&A
June 26, 2026
-
3
min read
Last modified:
June 26, 2026

What M&A Advisor Fees Look Like for a Mid-Market Software Exit

M&A advisor fee structure for a mid-market software company exit

Table of Contents

Founders preparing for a software exit can find valuation multiples and benchmark data almost everywhere. What is much harder to find is a clear answer to a more practical question: what does it actually cost to run the process that sells the company?

A software business with $5M to $100M in ARR will often transact within the $20M to $200M enterprise value range. At that scale, the advisor fee is typically the single largest line item in the cost of a sale.

Fees in this segment do not work the way a flat “2% to 6%” answer suggests. The effective rate generally compresses as enterprise value rises, the fee structure matters more than the headline percentage, and the definition of transaction value can move the total fee more than a full percentage point. On a transaction of this size, the difference between a 2% and 6% fee can amount to millions of dollars.

This is a mid-market question, not a small-business one. What follows is a clear breakdown of the main fee components, an illustrative model of what they cost across the range, and a framework for assessing whether a proposal aligns the advisor’s incentives with the founder’s outcome.

Key Takeaways

Point Details
Mid-market software exits start around $20M EV A software company with $5M to $100M in ARR will often transact within the $20M to $200M enterprise value range. Advisor fees are structured for transactions at that scale, not for a small-business sale.
The effective fee compresses as EV rises Across the mid-market, the effective success fee runs from roughly 3 to 4 percent at the lower end toward about 1.5 to 2 percent at the top. The percentage falls while the dollar fee still grows.
Most mandates are retainer plus success fee At most firms, expect a monthly retainer that funds preparation and signals commitment, often credited against the success fee. At L40°, most mandates are run on a success-only basis, with the retainer waived.
Success fees are tiered, not flat Modified Lehman and related schedules apply declining rates across value brackets. The schedule and the fee base, not the headline percentage, drive the bill.
Fees are set per transaction Published averages are orientation, not a quote. Real fees adjust to scope, complexity, and process risk on a case-by-case basis.

How M&A advisor fees are structured

An M&A advisor fee is the compensation a sell-side advisor earns to run a company sale, typically a monthly retainer plus a success fee paid when the transaction closes. In the mid-market, most fee agreements share the same building blocks; the variation is in how each is sized and when it is paid.

  • Retainer or work fee. A monthly or upfront fee that funds preparation and signals seller commitment. It is highly negotiable and frequently credited against the success fee at close. Some advisors may waive it for larger or particularly attractive mandates. At L40°, most mandates are run on a success-only basis, with no retainer.
  • Success fee. The bulk of the compensation, paid only if the deal closes, calculated as a percentage of transaction value. This is where advisor and seller incentives are meant to align.
  • Minimum fee. A floor on the success fee. It rarely binds at $20M+ EV but defines the smallest fee an advisor will accept to take on a time-intensive process.
  • Tail period. A window after the engagement ends, often 12 to 24 months, during which the advisor still earns a success fee if the company sells to a buyer they introduced.
  • Exclusivity. The period during which the advisor is the sole representative. Founders should confirm the term and the conditions for ending it.

Success fee mechanics: the Lehman family of schedules

The Lehman formula is a tiered success fee that applies a declining percentage across value brackets. The original is a 5-4-3-2-1 structure: 5 percent of the first million of value, 4 percent of the second, and so on down to 1 percent on the balance. Inflation made the original numbers unworkable for modern deals, so two variants dominate today. The Double Lehman doubles each rate (10-8-6-4-2) and shows up on smaller, higher-touch deals. The Modified Lehman compresses the upper tiers and is the common shape in mid-market transactions, which is why effective rates in this band sit lower than the headline tiers imply.

Common Success Fee Schedules

Schedule Where It Shows Up What It Means for the Seller
Original Lehman (5-4-3-2-1) Largely historical; referenced as the baseline Declining rate by bracket; rarely used as-is on modern deals
Double Lehman (10-8-6-4-2) Smaller, higher-touch deals below the mid-market Higher effective rate; reflects work-to-value ratio on small deals
Modified Lehman Common in mid-market software exits Compressed upper tiers; lower effective rate as EV rises
Accelerator / Reverse Tiers Founder-aligned alternative Rate rises with outperformance, rewarding the advisor for a higher price

The last row is the most important one for alignment. A schedule that pays the advisor more as the price climbs ties their incentive to maximizing the outcome rather than closing quickly. That distinction sits at the center of how to read any fee proposal.

What advisor fees actually cost across the mid-market

The table below is an illustrative model of prevailing market structures, not an L40° rate card. It applies documented Modified and Double Lehman schedules across the band and expresses the result as a range, sanity-checked against mid-market survey data. Use it only for orientation. Actual fees are set per transaction.

Exit Size (EV) Typical Structure Modeled Success Fee Effective % What Drives It
$20M Modified Lehman ~$600K to $800K ~3 to 4% Entry to mid-market; full schedule applies
$50M Modified Lehman ~$1.2M to $1.6M ~2.5 to 3% Larger base, lower marginal rate
$75M Modified Lehman ~$1.6M to $2.1M ~2.2 to 2.8% Upper tiers compress
$100M Modified Lehman / negotiated ~$2.0M to $2.6M ~2 to 2.6% Approaches lower-bound mid-market rate
$200M Negotiated / capped ~$3.0M to $4.0M ~1.5 to 2% Rate negotiated down at scale

Illustrative only. These ranges reflect common mid-market market practice. Success fees are negotiated on a transaction-by-transaction basis based on scope, complexity, process risk, and the engagement structure. As deal size increases, fee structures often evolve. At L40°, larger mandates are typically run on a success-only basis, with no retainer and compensation tied entirely to a completed transaction.

Why the headline percentage is the wrong thing to negotiate

Two proposals with the same success fee percentage can produce very different bills. The L40° Fee Alignment Lens reads any fee proposal across three axes that decide what you actually pay and what the advisor is motivated to do.

  • Fee base. What counts toward transaction value? Whether earnouts, rollover equity, and seller notes are included can swing the fee well beyond a point of headline rate.
  • Retainer credit. Is the retainer credited against the success fee at close, or paid on top of it? Credited retainers keep the advisor's incentive tied to the outcome.
  • Minimum and tail. How high is the minimum, and how long and broad is the tail? The minimum establishes the lowest success fee the advisor will accept if a transaction closes, reflecting the amount of work required to prepare and run a competitive process even when the final transaction value falls below expectations. The tail protects the advisor if the company later sells to a buyer introduced during the engagement, but an overly broad tail can create fee exposure long after the mandate ends.

In practice, a lower headline percentage combined with a broad fee base, an uncredited retainer, or an expansive tail can cost more than a higher rate with clearly defined terms. The objective is not simply to negotiate the smallest percentage. It is to understand what the structure rewards and whether the advisor’s economics remain aligned with the seller’s outcome.

For a fuller framework on evaluating an advisor beyond fees, including track record, buyer access, and red flags, see our guide to finding the right M&A advisor.

What this means for founders

The advisor fee is the largest cost of a sale, though not the only one: legal, quality-of-earnings, and tax advisory sit alongside it. Across the mid-market the effective success fee lands in a fairly predictable band, so the figure itself is rarely where a process is won or lost. The better question is not “what is your rate” but “what does your structure incentivize you to do.” Fee structure is a proxy for whose outcome the advisor optimizes.

L40° runs partner-led, sell-side processes for software, tech, and AI founders in exactly this band, with compensation structured around the seller's outcome. 

If you want a candid read on what a competitive process would cost and capture for your business, talk to a partner.

Recommended

Contact an advisor   →

Frequently Asked Questions

How much do M&A advisors charge to sell a software company?

For a mid-market software exit in the $20M to $200M enterprise value range, the range a $5M+ ARR company typically transacts in, expect a monthly retainer plus a success fee at close. Effective success fees usually run from roughly 3 to 4 percent at the lower end down toward 1.5 to 2 percent at the top, because tiered schedules apply lower rates to higher value brackets. Fees are set per transaction.

What is a typical success fee on a $50M software exit?

Around 2.5 to 3 percent in effective terms under a Modified Lehman schedule, roughly $1.2M to $1.6M, depending on structure, fee base, and how transaction value is defined. Actual fees are negotiated case-by-case.

What is the Lehman formula in M&A?

A tiered success fee that applies a declining percentage across value brackets. The original is 5-4-3-2-1; the Modified Lehman variant compresses the upper tiers and is common in mid-market transactions. The schedule, not just the headline rate, determines the total.

Do M&A advisors charge a retainer?

Most do, although retainers could be negotiable and are often credited against the success fee at close. Some advisors may waive the retainer on larger or particularly attractive mandates. At L40°, most engagements are structured on a success-only basis, with no retainer.

What does it cost to sell a company at $5M ARR?

A software company with $5M in ARR could transact at approximately $20M in enterprise value if it receives a 4x ARR multiple, although the actual valuation will depend on growth, retention, profitability, market position, and buyer demand. Advisor fees are calculated against transaction value rather than ARR. At a $20M enterprise value, an effective success fee of approximately 4% may be a reasonable reference point, but the final rate and structure are negotiated for each mandate.

Should I pick the advisor with the lowest fee?

Not on headline rate alone. A lower percentage paired with a broad fee base, an uncredited retainer, or a long tail can ultimately cost more than a higher rate with clearly defined terms.

More importantly, the fee should be assessed against the advisor’s track record, buyer access, process capabilities, and alignment with the seller. An advisor who charges less but generates weaker competitive tension, reaches the wrong buyers, or negotiates a poorer outcome can leave substantially more value on the table than the fee difference itself. The objective is not to hire the cheapest advisor, but the one most likely to maximize the seller’s net outcome.

No items found.
About the author
Andrea Balletbó
Andrea Balletbó
Head of Growth and Partnerships
Leads Growth and Partnerships at L40°, a cross-border M&A advisory firm specializing in sell-side mandates for software and technology companies. She has spent her career at the intersection of startups, platforms, and capital, from co-founding a SaaS company to building strategic partnerships at a top-tier tech company in the Bay Area. As part of the founding team behind Boopos, which exited in 2025, she went on to help establish L40°, where she now works closely with founders navigating exits, acquisitions, and cross-border expansion.
Disclaimer: The content published on L40° Insights is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Insights reflect market experience and strategic analysis but are general in nature. Each business is different, and valuations, deal dynamics, and outcomes can vary significantly based on company-specific factors and market conditions. For guidance tailored to your circumstances, reach out to L40 advisors for professional support.

Related Insights

Data room for investors: How to build one for your SaaS

Data room for investors: How to build one for your SaaS

Data room for investors: How to build one to sell your SaaS

Learn how to build a data room for your SaaS: what to include, how to organize it, and key mistakes to avoid to streamline diligence and build investor trust.
M&A Deal Structures for SaaS

M&A Deal Structures for SaaS

M&A deal structures for SaaS: How to choose one that works for you

Learn how SaaS founders can choose the right M&A deal structure: balancing liquidity, risk, and alignment to turn headline valuation into realized value.
SaaS Multiples: Methods and Company Valuation in 2026

SaaS Multiples: Methods and Company Valuation in 2026

Private SaaS valuation methods, 2026 multiples by company profile, and what separates a 4x from a 7x deal. Talk to L40°.

Where You Can
Find Us

With offices in Miami, Lisbon and Madrid, L40° bridges global markets to deliver impactful results. Our expertise and international reach ensure every transaction is handled with the highest level of professionalism and care.

CONTACT US

Where You Can
Find Us

With offices in Miami, Lisbon and Madrid, L40° bridges global markets to deliver impactful results. Our expertise and international reach ensure every transaction is handled with the highest level of professionalism and care.

CONTACT US