In SaaS M&A, the NDA is more than a legal formality: it’s the gateway to serious dialogue. In most cases, the question “What is the company’s name?” followed by “I want to learn more” is what triggers the conversation for a non-disclosure agreement.
Signed early in the process, often right after an anonymized teaser sparks interest, the NDA sets clear boundaries for what can be shared and when.
But contrary to popular belief, it is not a green light for full transparency. Sensitive information, such as proprietary code, customer contracts, and product roadmaps, can remain off-limits until due diligence is completed after a letter of intent (LOI) is in place.
What to disclose and when is something an advisor will be best suited to assess on a case-by-case basis, given that it will also depend on what type of buyer is sitting on the other side of the negotiation, the nature of the relationship, and the risks between the sell-side and buy-side.
Overall, the NDA creates a structured environment for staged, selective disclosure, giving SaaS founders the confidence to engage without giving away leverage. Done right, it protects your edge while keeping momentum on your side.
What is the M&A NDA (and what is it not?)
In SaaS M&A, the NDA provides the legal foundation for sharing confidential information with potential buyers. It protects sensitive company data while enabling founders to disclose key details in a controlled and staged manner, ensuring that information is shared only with qualified parties and under clearly defined terms.
What the M&A NDA covers
A well-drafted NDA clearly outlines the key restrictions and expectations regarding the use of shared information. For SaaS companies, this is critical given the intangible nature of the product. The agreement typically includes provisions such as:
- Use and disclosure restrictions: The buyer may only use confidential information for evaluating the potential transaction and may not share it with any unauthorized parties (e.g., legal counsel, financial advisors).
- Access control: Specifies who on the buyer’s side may view the materials, often requiring prior written approval for third-party access.
- Return or destruction requirements: If the deal does not proceed, all confidential information must be returned or destroyed, closing the loop on information exposure.
These protections allow sellers to disclose selectively and with confidence, knowing the legal guardrails are in place.
What the M&A NDA does not cover
Just as important as understanding what’s inside the NDA is knowing what isn’t:
- Valuation and economic terms: The NDA doesn’t commit either side to any price, structure, or earnout.
- Exclusivity or binding deal terms: Items like exclusivity windows, indemnities, or closing conditions belong in the letter of intent (LOI) or definitive agreement, not the NDA.
- Approval to proceed with diligence: The NDA is a prerequisite, not a greenlight. Signing it signals interest, not intent.
Founders should view the NDA as an entry point more than a commitment.
Why the NDA matters for SaaS sellers
SaaS companies operate in a high-leverage, high-IP environment. Product code, client relationships, team structure, and roadmap vision are all potential value drivers, but also potential liabilities if disclosed prematurely. A strong NDA gives the seller the ability to:
- Control the timing and sequencing of disclosures
- Prevent misappropriation of sensitive or strategic information
- Create a formal threshold for buyer seriousness, helping to filter out opportunistic or unqualified parties.
Even seemingly basic information, such as the company name, market niche, or top-line KPIs, can be competitively sensitive. The NDA ensures that this first layer of disclosure happens on the seller’s terms, under legal protection, and in alignment with the broader M&A strategy.
Read: AI Valuation Multiples: Most Valuable Industries in 2025
Types of NDAs in M&A: A SaaS-Focused Comparison
Key NDA terms SaaS founders should focus on
Not all NDAs provide the same level of protection. For SaaS founders, attention to specific clauses can make the difference between a secure, efficient process and one that creates risk or friction. Below are six provisions that deserve attention:
1. Definition of confidential information
This clause defines what is and isn’t protected. It should cover not just technical IP (e.g., code snippets or system architecture), but also business metrics, customer data, employee information, and strategic materials. Broad, SaaS-specific language prevents loopholes.
2. Permitted disclosures
The NDA should clearly define who the buyer can share information with, typically legal, financial, or technical advisors, and under what conditions. Equivalent confidentiality obligations should bind all third parties.
3. Use restrictions
Confidential information must be used solely to evaluate the transaction. The NDA should explicitly prohibit any commercial, competitive, or derivative use, particularly important when the buyer is a potential competitor.
4. Term and survival
The agreement should specify the duration of the confidentiality obligations. For SaaS companies, terms of 18–36 months are standard, with more extended survival periods for highly sensitive data. This protects post-process exposure, even if a deal falls through.
5. Standstill and no-solicit clauses
In some cases, especially with strategic buyers, founders may want optional protections that limit unsolicited acquisition attempts or talent poaching for a defined period. While not always standard, these clauses can safeguard against disruptive behavior.
6. Data privacy and compliance
For SaaS businesses handling regulated data, the NDA should explicitly reference applicable laws and require the buyer to follow them. This is critical when sharing customer-related information, even in anonymized form.
Don’t miss: Why do M&A’s fail
Common traps on NDAs and how to avoid them
Even experienced founders can fall into preventable traps when executing NDAs in an M&A process. Here are four of the most common missteps and how L40° helps sellers avoid them:
1. Over-disclosure too early (especially to strategic buyers)
Sharing too much, too soon, can erode negotiation leverage or expose competitive vulnerabilities. This risk is amplified when the buyer is also a market peer. Disclosing roadmap plans, customer breakdowns, or technical differentiators prematurely can lead to a loss of optionality or, worse, a competitive disadvantage.
How L40° addresses this risk
Through a staged disclosure model, L40° sequences what gets shared and when. Sellers begin with controlled, high-level materials (e.g., name, key performance indicators, market footprint) and reserve detailed operational information for due diligence, post-LOI.
2. Vague definitions or boilerplate terms
NDAs pulled from templates often include generic or ambiguous definitions of “confidential information,” which can leave room for interpretation and reduce the effectiveness of the agreement. Inadequate enforcement language can also make it harder to respond decisively if confidentiality is compromised.
How L40° addresses this risk
NDAs are customized to reflect SaaS-specific sensitivities: technical IP, customer metrics, pricing strategy, and data privacy obligations. L40° works closely with legal counsel to ensure clarity, enforceability, and alignment with international standards.
3. Poorly staged information release
Sellers sometimes disclose materials without a clear release plan, leading to inconsistent buyer experiences and internal confusion. This can stall momentum and expose sensitive information during early-stage conversations.
How L40° addresses this risk
Each buyer engagement is governed by a release playbook. Data room access is structured by milestone (pre-LOI vs. post-LOI), and L40° ensures each round of disclosure is intentional, tracked, and legally supported.
4. Jurisdictional blind spots in cross-border deals
In international transactions, NDA disputes can become complicated if the agreement’s governing law or venue favors the buyer’s jurisdiction, often unintentionally. For example, a UK-based seller agreeing to Delaware jurisdiction without negotiation may inadvertently accept a less favorable dispute forum.
How L40° addresses this risk
L40° flags jurisdictional risk early and negotiates for frameworks that protect the seller, either under the seller’s home jurisdiction or a neutral venue. This reduces ambiguity in the event of enforcement and ensures the seller’s legal rights are preserved across borders.
How the NDA fits into the broader M&A process
In middle-market SaaS M&A, the NDA is a link in the sequencing of a professional, well-run process. Buyers, particularly institutional ones, expect a familiar flow that reflects discipline, confidentiality, and deal-readiness.
Why institutional buyers expect this structure
Experienced buyers view M&A process clarity as a sign of a credible counterparty. A well-structured NDA phase signals that:
- The seller is prepared.
- Information will be released in a logical, secure sequence.
- The playing field is level for all parties, reducing the risk of misinformation or unequal access.
It also prevents backchannel information flows that can disrupt valuation or trust.
Aligning NDA timing with process velocity
The NDA should be triggered immediately after a buyer expresses serious interest in the teaser. Delaying this step can stall the process, especially in competitive dynamics. At the same time, rushing into an NDA without control can lead to over-disclosure or misalignment.
L40° ensures NDA execution is timed precisely to maintain deal velocity, enabling rapid buyer engagement while protecting strategic information.
Preserving leverage through structured disclosure
One of the biggest misconceptions in early-stage M&A is that signing an NDA opens the gates to all internal data. It doesn’t… and it shouldn’t.
A properly constructed NDA enables the seller to:
- Reveal only what’s appropriate for the stage (e.g., company name, business summary, financial highlights).
- Hold back the most sensitive materials—like source code, customer contracts, churn cohorts, and roadmap details—until after a letter of intent (LOI) is signed and diligence formally begins.
- Retain control over how disclosures are staged, documented, and verified.
This preserves negotiating leverage, minimizes operational exposure, and helps ensure that sensitive data is only shared with committed buyers operating under exclusivity.
Craft the right NDA for your SaaS with the right partners
When structured correctly, the NDA enables secure, staged disclosure, filters serious buyers, and preserves leverage through diligence and negotiation.
L40° works with SaaS founders to navigate this step with discretion and efficiency. From tailoring NDA terms to managing cross-border legal frameworks and executing staged disclosure strategies, we ensure that confidentiality aligns with deal momentum. Contact us.
